Having had a previous, excruciating hysteroscopy (at an appointment I just thought was to discuss a polyp found by my GP) I was anxious when referred for a second, with biopsy.
At the appointment I was advised that a Mirena coil would help with my endometrial hyperplasia - this I also suspected would be extremely painful. I outlined my fears and asked about anaesthesia only to be told that a Local Anaesthetic (LA) would be worse than the procedure. There was no mention of any further options. I was asked rather brusquely if I gave consent and, at this point I felt I had no choice but to reluctantly continue, with no form of anaesthesia or analgesic at all, in the hope that I’d remembered the pain wrongly. In effect my fears and wishes were disregarded.
The procedure was, as expected, excruciating. I was subjected to what I believe is called a “vocal local” which was ineffective and which I consider patronising. There was little empathy from the consultant (and observer) and being told I was doing, really well, and to, curl my toes, no matter how kindly delivered by the nurse in attendance, did nothing to help me through the process.
After a while I was offered gas and air but this only served to make me feel sick and did not alleviate the agony. It was quite obvious that I was in extreme pain. I was not asked if I wanted the procedure to stop, nor was any offer made to stop. When it finally was all over I was not asked how I was feeling but directed to a small curtained-off area of the treatment room to get dressed. I then had to make my way - shocked, in pain and bleeding - all the way back (no small distance) to the main entrance.
I was not asked on the day what my pain score was, nor asked for any feedback. I have not been asked for feedback to this day. I am a post-menopausal woman and therefore, I believe, at higher risk of severe pain.
I feel I should have been offered the option of returning for a General Anaesthetic (GA) given my history and previous experience which I clearly articulated - on the contrary I was effectively refused a LA.
It seems standard procedure at this hospital that an OPH (outpatient hysteroscopy)- described by many women (including myself) as barbaric and medieval - is done without any form of sedation or analgesia (unlike say colonoscopy where it is standard), and the onus is on the woman to request it. It should be offered as a baseline, with women being able to opt-out and not, as is the case, to opt-in. This is 2023, not 1823.
Although the appointment was in January of this year it would not be melodramatic to say I was traumatised by the experience and it invades my thoughts every day. Also, I was never given chance to read the leaflet about the IUD - it was given to me either immediately before the procedure or just before I left, I can’t exactly remember - so I do not consider that I was in a position to give informed consent with regard to either the pain of fitting or the potential significant side-effects and risks.
"Not melodramatic to say I was traumatised by the experience"
About: Chesterfield Royal Hospital / Gynaecology Chesterfield Royal Hospital Gynaecology S44 5BL
Posted by CeeJay1260 (as ),
Do you have a similar story to tell?
Tell your story & make a difference
››
Responses
Update posted by CeeJay1260 (a service user) 2 years ago
See more responses from Vikki Develin
Update posted by CeeJay1260 (a service user) 2 years ago
See more responses from Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Update posted by CeeJay1260 (a service user) nearly 2 years ago
See more responses from Rachel Walker
Update posted by CeeJay1260 (a service user) nearly 2 years ago
Update posted by CeeJay1260 (a service user) nearly 2 years ago
See more responses from Vikki Develin
Update posted by CeeJay1260 (a service user) nearly 2 years ago