My family member had a recent inpatient stay in ward 28 RAH. They were there for 4 weeks and as a result of poor nutrition lost weight and became more frail as a result. I did observe the food quality to be generally poor and unappetising. Vegetable choice was limited and overcooked. There was rarely offer of fresh fruit. A sugary doughnut is not a nutritious dessert. There was only 6 of each of the 3 food choices and this was served on a first come first served basis which further limits patient choice. This is a significant issue in elderly patients who may have simple tastes and are at increased risk of malnutrition and delayed healing as a result.
Why are patients not asked what meals they would like in advance? This would presumably have the added advantage of reduced waste as I saw many meals being returned either partially or entirely uneaten.
Why are additional nutritious snacks not offered to patients who cannot eat the meals?
What is the quality control around reheated pre-prepared meals?
When menus are being planned is there any patient or family feedback sought as to palatability? Are dietitians involved to inform quality of nutrition or is the food provision based purely on cost?
"Poor nutrition"
About: Royal Alexandra Hospital / Urology (Ward 28) Royal Alexandra Hospital Urology (Ward 28) PA2 9PN
Posted by HA26 (as ),
Do you have a similar story to tell?
Tell your story & make a difference ››
Responses
See more responses from Nicole McInally