Text size

Theme

Language

"Communication needs to be improved"

About: Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow / Clinical Genetics

(as a service user),

I'm not usually one to complain about the services provided by the NHS. I am a proud employee of the NHS myself and I know first hand the pressures they are under.

However I feel very let down by my recent experience with the genetics department and I would hate for someone to have a similar experience.

I would like to first mention that my initial appointment was fantastic,the staff member was so empathetic and professional and explained everything in careful detail to ensure we understood the process. Which is why the follow up experience the  left me feeling let down.

Myself and my partner had an appointment booked in the genetics department for the afternoon which we attended 10 minutes early, to then be told we were late and we should have been there 30 minutes earlier. My partner was then rushed in to have his bloods taken, this should have been a simple procedure but as it was rushed he had 2 failed attempts at obtaining bloods. He was asked to come back down after his other appointment for a saliva sample as this was just as efficient, but my question is why was his bloods rushed (and failed) if a simple sample of saliva would be sufficient?

This made him feel very flustered and not relaxed at all, which in my opinion is important at appointments of this sensitive nature.

He was then directed to the andrology suite to which he arrived at to be told his appointment was 2 and that he would need to check in downstairs at reception first and then come back at 2. My partner was handed a sample pot for his sperm sample and was to sit downstairs with this in hand until his appointment at 2pm (30 minutes later) surrounded by people eating lunch. I didn't feel this was handled appropriately or in a dignified manner at all. 

We then attend the andrology appointment together, at this point we were told he could not provide a sample because he had not been abstinent from ejaculation for 48 hours. At no point was this communicated at all, and believe it or not this was our first time experiencing the andrology suite and so had no idea what to expect. 

My partner was then told he would have to phone to make a future appointment, to which he done.

The first nurse then very kindly followed up with my partner to give some reassurance about the process which was appreciated. They told us they had booked him in the andrology suite for a further appointment but my partner explained he already made one himself. When they checked this up, the appointment for my partner had in fact not been made. Thankfully we were made aware of this or again we would be turning up for a wasted appointment.

In summary, I think communication needs to be improved immediately. The way things have been handled does not leave me feeling positive for the rest of the experience. I don't think they've been dealt with sensitively or dignified at all and I think that has to change given the nature of the department.

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Lucy Dorrian, Patient Experience and Public Involvement Manager, Patient Experience and Public Involvement Team, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde last month
Lucy Dorrian
Patient Experience and Public Involvement Manager, Patient Experience and Public Involvement Team,
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Submitted on 17/03/2025 at 18:21
Published on Care Opinion at 18:21


Dear Jane743,

Thank you for taking the time to share your recent experience with the genetics department. We apologise for the distress and inconvenience caused during your visit.

We are pleased to hear that your initial appointment was positive and that our staff member provided empathetic and professional care. However, we deeply regret that your follow-up experience did not meet the same standard.

We apologise for any confusion or miscommunication regarding the appointment time. We will review our scheduling procedures to ensure clearer communication in the future.

We are sorry to hear about the rushed blood draw and the failed attempts to obtain a sample and we regret that it caused your partner discomfort and stress.

The information regarding the requirement for abstinence from ejaculation for 48 hours prior to providing a sperm sample should have been clearly communicated to you beforehand. We will ensure that all necessary information is provided to patients in advance of their appointments.

We are glad that a nurse followed up with your partner to provide reassurance and assistance with scheduling a new appointment. However, we regret the confusion regarding the booking of this appointment and will take steps to prevent such errors in the future.

We recognise that communication needs to be improved, and we are committed to addressing these issues to ensure that all patients receive sensitive and dignified care. Your feedback has highlighted areas where we can improve, and we will take action to make these changes.

Thanks

Lucy

Patient Experience and Public Involvement Team (PEPI)

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k